The Christian Faith

 

The Christian faith is a gentle, humble, patient faith.

It is not a boastful, proud, forceful, or dominating movement that fearfully and demandingly converts those who are weaker.

Nor is it a deceitful, scheming, wealthy or clever faith.

It is a serving faith, willing to do what others would not. The menial tasks, the jobs that most would avoid.

It is a giving faith. Giving and forgiving.

It is a joyful faith, secure in the love of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. 

It is a singing faith, joyful in the love of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

It is an expectant faith, knowing that God blesses us and keeps us in all circumstances.

It is a patient faith, knowing that the seasons God provides will be effective in bringing about the harvest that God is preparing.

It is a suffering faith, understanding and accepting that we are supported in our struggles, and gain wisdom and maturity as well as humility through these.

We accept all that God provides for us, and also what he removes.

We do falter in our Christian walk, and are prone to wandering, but the true Shepherd is faithful to guide, restore and lead us to the goal he has planned.

We are not ashamed to call on his name. Jesus, our Lord.

“Woman, why do you involve me?” Jesus replied. “My hour has not yet come." John 2:4 (NIV)

This verse has probably caused unrest between denominations. Even being familiar with it, as I am, I still feel uneasy reading these words. For full disclosure I wish to state that I hold to a reformed understanding of Christianity. However, I have a Catholic upbringing and have some understanding of the sentiments held from that perspective. I will also state clearly that I am not able to, nor have I tried to translate this verse from the original Greek. I have simply read a number of English versions of the verse.

Some would argue that this verse is evidence of Jesus being convinced or coerced into action he would not have taken, if not for his mother’s suggestion/request.

The language Mary is quoted to have used is not coercive. “They have no more wine”. A simple statement of fact. 

As a son to a loving mother, I can envisage myself in a similar circumstance, and I sense the quiet concern in the statement, and my implied responsibilities as a son with potential means to rectify a problem.

Both Mary and Jesus (as well as the disciples) were invited to this wedding feast. 

Were they close relatives? Were they distant relatives? 

Were they from Mary’s side, or Joseph’s side of the family?

Why were all the disciples invited?

Were the hosts rash or overly optimistic, inviting more than they could cater for? Were wedding invitations inclusive of more distant relatives (and therefore large numbers) simply an expected norm, no matter the financial means of the hosts? Or were numbers of invited guests deliberately larger than numbers of available seats, knowing that some would likely not attend, like the bookings of some airlines?

Did they have a little bit of that Australian attitude of, “she’ll be right”, meaning, “don’t worry, it will all work out”, (despite poor planning)?

I find myself thinking about the feeding of the five thousand when Jesus asks the disciples to feed the crowd. The disciples knew full well that there was barely food for them to share. In that situation I could almost hear Jesus stating “O you of little faith”, though he does not.

If nothing else, Mary seems to lack no faith in what her son is able to achieve, regarding the catering of wine.

Is it possible that Mary was close enough to the hosts to have previously reassured them in their invitation of “extras”, such as the disciples, knowing that Jesus would be able to save the situation? Could I go further and suggest that she expected this outcome, maybe even engineered it?

These last comments (of a "meddling" Mary) are clearly going beyond the written word, and I am on thin ice even suggesting them, nowhere is Mary's character maligned in this way.

Does Mary have special sway with her son, Jesus?

Is she able to influence his actions more than another?

The Catholic understanding is; if we are in need, approaching Mary may help things happen more than approaching Jesus directly. At least that is my understanding of common Catholic thoughts regarding prayer, and needs.

For many Catholics, Mary, is much more “approachable”, being "fully" human, and a mother, and an “ordinary” person. (Yes I grew up with a strict, stern father, and my mother was able to soften his resistance to some of my requests/wishes as a child, that he otherwise would have simply said “no” to.)

Yet Catholic teaching (I believe) is that Mary is not an ordinary person, she is “immaculate”, meaning she was born without original sin, and remained a life-long virgin, and ascended to heaven without going through physical death.

My reading of the New Testament gives no clear teaching regarding this last paragraph. What I have read states that Mary remained a virgin until the birth of Jesus (Matthew 1:25), and that Jesus then had other brothers (Matthew 12:46) and presumably sisters (Matthew 13:56). I also do not hold that she was "immaculate", this understanding is a theological construct, based on the belief that God would not choose the womb of a fallen woman for the incarnation, and that by default, an embryo in Mary;s womb, would inherit fallen genes, but God does not explain how the embryonic gene is formed within Mary, and whether any of Mary's DNA resides in Jesus. 

I do believe she was an ordinary person of faith who was greatly favoured by God, in his choosing of her to be the mother of our Saviour.

I also believe that Jesus is fully human, and does not need mediators between us and he. We are able to approach him directly with all our needs as well as our gratitude and worship.

There is no other miracle in the New Testament which describes Mary’s intervention or influence, though there are many miracles that describe certain other people intervening, eg the centurion for his servant (Matthew 8:5). 

As Christian leaders, elders, ministers, and clergy (I do not hold to a laity-clergy divide), we must be careful not to become mediators for others, but rather help people understand that we all have direct access to Jesus, and are free and invited to call on his great name.

And there is that short passage where Jesus is told that his mother and brothers have arrived, yet in response Jesus declares that everyone who does the will of God is his mother, brother and sister. (Matthew 12:46 and beyond) This verse, if nothing else, seems to state that Jesus counts faith (the desire to follow God) as the main influencing factor of his favour. Hence his often mentioned response "your faith has healed you".

Getting back to the verse in question.

Yes, I do believe mothers have sway over their children.

We, as Christian children of all ages, are to honour our parents, this is a command of God, the 5^th I believe.

And Jesus would certainly do this. He quotes that specific command (Matthew 15:3-6) as an example of how the Pharisees have nullified God’s word, so it would be hypocritical of Jesus not to honour his mother and father. (We presume at this point Joseph is no longer alive, though it is not stated anywhere.)

Mary understood this as well, and therefore expected Jesus to follow her concern, despite the fact that, from Jesus’ point of view, his ministry had not yet started.

Was Jesus short with Mary?

“My hour has not yet come” is a strong statement.

I believe Jesus was correct. He knew clearly when his ministry of signs and wonders was to commence. He was not suffering stage fright. He was not simply avoiding a relatively trivial situation of need. He knew the significance and preciousness of his works of power, and would not use them for show, or without the intended purpose of displaying the kingdom of God, nor would he go beyond what he knew his Father in heaven intended. In other words, just because he “could” didn’t mean he “should”.

I assure you that there were many widows in Israel in Elijah’s time, when the sky was shut for three and a half years and there was a severe famine throughout the land. Yet Elijah was not sent to any of them, but to a widow in Zarephath in the region of Sidon. Luke 4:25-26 NIV

I also do not hold that Mary had a greater understanding than Jesus as to when his ministry was to begin.

When exactly was this “hour” that had not yet come?

The other gospels describe the baptism of Jesus, followed by the forty days in the wilderness, followed by the calling of the disciples and then his preaching in Galilee. Luke's Gospel, implies that he has performed miracles in other places eg capernaum, prior to his preaching in Nazareth.

John’s gospel does not mention the forty days in the wilderness, so it is possible that this wedding took place after the forty days in the wilderness, but before his preaching at the synagogue in Nazareth.

I might suggest that Jesus reading from the scroll in Isaiah and proclaiming that “today this reading is fulfilled in your presence” was the beginning of Jesus public ministry. (Luke's timeline puts the calling of the disciples after this event, so it is hard to place the wedding banquet in this timeline)

Was he to announce his prophetic fulfillment of being sent to give sight to the blind and release of captives, and the year of God’s favour, before he actually did it?

If this is the case, then a miracle before this proclamation of God’s word, was somehow, out of place. This is my explanation of Jesus’ reluctance to perform a public miracle at this point. If this is so, then Mary is in an awkward position asking Jesus to help this situation of embarrassment for the wedding hosts who for unknown reasons, have under-catered. Mary clearly feels for the situation, more than Jesus.

Her own wedding, if she had one, would have been a quiet affair, having been scandalised by her untimely pregnancy. She may have had more emotion invested in the smooth running of this anonymous wedding, and again I wonder how closely related she was to the family of the bride or groom. Jesus on the other hand seems to have little concern other than that he is now in the situation of honouring his mother, yet preserving his anonymity and obedience to the wise Spirit-planned path of his ministry.

 

Was Jesus surprised and unprepared for this request?

Was he annoyed?

Was he short with his mother?

By faith my answer is no, no, and no.

By faith I believe Jesus always spoke the truth in love.

We cannot gain the tone of his statement to his mother from the written word.

He may have been smiling as he said what he said. Yet he was serious and truthful, and I believe Mary knew she had forced his hand prematurely.

In conclusion

Do we need Mary’s intervention in our lives today as Christians?

Although my Catholic friends and brethren would likely say yes, my answer is no. 

If we are in need, in the depths of trouble, despair, suffering, fear, or danger, we have a faithful high priest and saviour who is able to hear and answer our prayers.

Is Mary able to hear our prayers?

As a young man, I used to believe that my deceased grandmother, whom I remain convinced was strong in faith, and therefore, saved, as a catholic who loved Jesus, I used to believe that she (as well as God) could see everything I did, now that she was in heaven.

But as a more mature Christian, I don’t see that the Bible supports this understanding.

Nothing is hidden from God. And Jesus who is God, is able to see everything. But deceased humans, in heaven, with the Lord, are they able to see everything?

And if they somehow could, are they able to intervene?

 

These are difficult questions to answer dogmatically, but the safe and simple answer is to rely on what scripture clearly teaches, and that is that we are to pray in Jesus’ name to our Father in heaven, who knows what we need, even before we utter a word.

Surely when our minds and hearts are focused on the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, that is the most useful and joyful and obedient place to be. And any other image or name that is put in that place is potentially a distraction from true worship.

Events in Jesus life prophetic of the cross and resurrection.

The climax of each gospel account is clearly the arrest, trial and crucifixion of Jesus. This is sometimes referred to as the “passion” of Jesus. I mention this because, in terms of volume and detail, this part of each gospel is significant, outweighing the other described events of his life and ministry, including the resurrection. In those chapters, it is as though time slows down, and events are described hour by hour, moment by moment. These passages are at the end of each of the four gospels and take up a large volume of the gospel narrative. The resurrection itself is given a relatively brief treatment, despite its major effect and implication.

 

Having reflected on the baptism of Jesus, which occurs close to the beginning of each gospel, and is considered the beginning of Jesus earthly ministry, I wish to suggest that this, along with other events in Jesus’ ministry and life prior to his death and resurrection, have an added significance, beyond the actual event. I believe the baptism of Jesus was both an image of, and a true entering-into the work of the cross.

 

Paul states in the book of Romans, and elsewhere, that when we as Christians, are baptised, we are baptised into the death of Jesus, and rising from the waters, we are also rising as with the resurrected Christ.

I believe that Jesus understood his own baptism in exactly this way, that he was foreshadowing and willingly entering into his death and resurrection in being baptised, fulfilling all righteousness.

His baptism shows Jesus’ willingness to identify himself with sinful humanity. He was ready to take on the sin of the world, (John announces and identifies him as the lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world) as he approached the time and place of his baptism.

This understanding of his baptism I believe escaped John, who was awed by his presence and the understanding of his purpose and authority. John questioned his own worthiness to baptise Jesus, knowing he himself was the lesser of the two, and was in need of his own redemption, being born of Adam, and a sinner in his own right, not that any of this is mentioned other than his doubting when he was in prison.

But Jesus makes things clear that it was right to be baptised, to “fulfill all righteousness”.

This is an interesting comment, and it is these words that lead me to consider that his baptism was in fact a willing and effective entering into the carrying of the sin of the world, in other words, Jesus is stating physically that he is willing to be crucified and has the true hope of resurrection in his act of being baptised. He is surrendering himself to God’s will, and, in a definite manner, actually accepting death and resurrection, which we know is the path he will soon tread.

God blesses this action, God the Holy Spirit visibly descends on him, and the voice of the Father is heard declaring “This is my son, with whom I am well pleased”.

I will add a few points to these thoughts.

 

Firstly, when the “sons of thunder” are asked by Jesus if they can undergo the baptism that he is to undergo, he is clearly speaking of his crucifixion, as well as in Luke 12, when Jesus talks about the baptism he is to undergo, again he is talking about the cross.

 

Secondly, when we confess, as Paul teaches, that there is one baptism for the forgiveness of sins; if I were to ask specifically what is this one baptism? my answer can only be the baptism of Jesus.

 

Finally, if we do see Jesus’ earthly baptism as the beginning of his crucifixion, his first step into carrying the sin of the whole world, or a foreshadowing of it in a powerful and God ordained way, then this adds to our understanding of the meaning of our own baptism, which is our physical way of entering into the way of the cross. By being baptised we are metaphorically and physically, by faith, entering into the death and resurrection of Jesus. It adds weight to Pauls statement that “I have been crucified with Christ, and it is no longer I that liveth but Christ that liveth in me!

Having pondered this, I also wondered about other events in Jesus’ life. For example, his being left behind, or temporarily lost by his parents at age 12. It was after 3 days that his parents found him, in his Father’s house.

This is by no means an indefensible thought, but those 3 days of Jesus absence could also be compared to the 3 days between crucifixion and resurrection. Certainly, for his mother and father, with an understanding that Jesus is the Lamb of God, their concern for his absence must surely have brought thoughts of whether his time had already come.

They had already experienced the escape into Egypt to avoid Herod’s wrath, and the words of Simeon that a sword would also pierce her own heart was potentially present during the time of frantic searching. And finding him well and in the ministry of God’s word, was a form of returning from the dead from the point of view of his parents.

Lastly, I will mention the 40 days in the wilderness, which occurred immediately following his baptism.

For that period of time, it is not mentioned that anyone missed Jesus’ presence, but being in the wilderness was surely a place where he may have come to injury and even death. Had he listened to the tempters suggestion, he may well have died by falling from the high place at the temple. Again, his entering into the wilderness and return, could be considered also a foreshadowing of the events of the cross and resurrection.

Certainly Jesus spoke a number of times to his disciples regarding his approaching death and resurrection, and on the mount of transfiguration, he met with Moses and Elijah, and there too they discussed his coming departure.

In conclusion I wish to suggest that there were a number of events in Jesus’ life and ministry, and possibly others I have not mentioned, that foreshadow the cross and resurrection, but most particularly, his personal baptism in the Jordan river with John the Baptist. This baptism, in my opinion, is the one true baptism that we all enter into by faith, and by our own baptism. Our own baptism, by nature, is an imperfect act. Who can say that enough preparation, meditation, prayer and study went into our own baptism to achieve true godliness. What if the baptiser were distracted, what if our pride was triggered at the wrong time. What if we were not fully immersed? And what of the issue of who has true authority to baptise today?

There are so many ways of not achieving what we can never achieve, that being true sanctity in Christ, but thanks be to God, who sent his Son, who willingly entered the waters of baptism on our behalf, in order to go to the baptism of the cross, where he carried us, we were crucified in and with him, and then he rose with us, victorious over death and sin, destroying all the works of the devil.

We are given the gift of baptism, to allow us to enter into what Jesus has already achieved for us. The tearing of the curtain, and our passing through to the Holy presence of the almighty. Jesus our Lord.

 

Morality and the Church

I am reasonably convinced that a big reason (largely unspoken) why people do not wish to go to church, or take on the Christian faith in the west, is due to what is perceived as the need to take on unfavourable moral attitudes and standards.

Yes, it is true that Christians are encouraged to live as godly people. It is a deep desire in all Christians to live according to the teachings of Jesus. To love our neighbours as ourselves, to love God with all our mind, strength, heart and soul, and to love each other as Christ loves us. And the agreed implication is also the Ten Commandments, to a strict degree (eg if you look at a woman with the wrong motives it is considered adultery, if you hate your brother it is considered murder) but there is also the beautiful description of the fruit of the Spirit, in Galatians 5, which we also long to express.

The reality is that as Christians, we fail at all of these continually, yet we love these characteristics and continue to model our lives on them. The reason that this is so, is because we have been given the precious gift of forgiveness. Forgiveness both now and into the future for our inability to do anything exactly as we should, and for all our past moral failures.

This was achieved by Jesus on the cross.

However to those outside the church, especially those who have had some Christian upbringing or contact, the idea of a life with strong moral values is probably repulsive. 

No matter how good the music or sermon or shared meals, this is likely a deal breaker for many. Added to this is the strong sense of God being unjust and uncaring (“If he does exist”), and the current alternative moral system that not only ridicules but chastises the “narrow mindedness” of Christian teaching. Especially of those who take the Bible literally.

So the likelihood that someone on that side of the fence will be attracted into the church or the Christian faith is, in my opinion, low. 

But there is still hope.

God can and does change people.

He does this through sometimes unpredictable circumstances, but they might include suffering, a moral dilemma and the right person at the right time. The good news must be heard sooner or later by this person, as this special word from God combined with the presence of God’s holiness, ( the person of the Holy Spirit) can and does effect powerful convincing convicting and converting of those, like us, who would otherwise prefer to continue on with our personal godless plans for our lives.

That word of truth, the message of the cross is both offensive and repulsive, except to those who are being saved, then it is powerful.

And so we go on in faith and hope and with prayer, hoping (and expecting) for that miracle to occur in those around us.

Greatness is not a substitute

Striving for greatness, in whatever form that might be, is something I have attempted, quietly or loudly, at different times. I don’t say this with any pride.

It is hard, in the west, not to dream of something going viral, even this little blog, even as a devoted Christian.

I say “in the West” as we have so much media in our lives. From waking to sleeping (and even during sleep, for some) we have screens taking up our minds and hearts. And as we are entertained, shocked, comforted, educated (and tempted to sin) by our screens, we can easily think of what it would be like being on the other side of that screen and what that could lead to.

And even apart from screens, as workers with skills, and as gifted people within our church environment, and elsewhere, how many of us dream that one day, a breakthrough would occur, something that would show our long hours of devoted labour as worthwhile, and somehow blessed, because we went the extra mile, or inch, or millimetre?

“Never let go of your dreams” is such a strong statement even amongst Christians. To me, this is the same as striving for greatness, though maybe not quite as obvious, or maybe not the case in every situation, but let’s say my dream was to write a great song? Notice the adjective is “great”?

 That is my little point made.

Substitute your dream without the word “great” in it, and maybe the dream becomes somewhat ho-hum.

I am heading towards retirement, and I am thinking about my work and achievements (or lack thereof) more at the moment. Have I made a difference? Have people been encouraged, and taught? Have I saved any lives as a doctor? Is my reputation good?

Have my successes outweighed my failures? Have I written a great song? Has my congregation gone wild with their love for God? Has the local community repented and turned to Christ?

If I could answer yes to one or more of the above, maybe I could say there was some greatness that was worth sharing, and would possibly earn me some remembrance after I’m gone, but is this what really counts in the end?

What are the deep things of God?

"Justice, mercy and faithfulness" seems to spring to mind, and these things can be practiced without an ounce of greatness.

I watched the last words of a well-known Christian man dying of cancer, and noticed his concern was to be at peace with all people, apologising if he had somehow offended people in his ministry. I found this so interesting.

It seems that every little thing counts in the end. If you were deliberately impatient or rude with someone who asked the wrong thing at the wrong time, that can still weigh on our consciences as we come to meet God.

And if nothing weighs on our consciences as we approach that final step, that could mean that our consciences are somehow numbed, like the foot without functioning nerve endings, due to diseases like diabetes or leprosy, they can step on a needle or a live coal, without pain. But the foot is still damaged and often leads to amputation...

Or it could mean that our consciences are clear because somehow we have made peace with all.

Is it possible to make peace with all?

My father made peace with long standing adversaries prior to his death. To me, that was evidence of his conversion and repentance, but can you make peace with people that are now living geographically elsewhere, out of phone connection, or out of mail connection, or out of the realm of the living?

The answer is of course yes, but it comes with a clause. You see we can’t actually do it ourselves, the true and only true peacemaker does this on our behalf, on the cross.

The point I am coming to is that we do have to change circumstances, careers, geography, and other things at various times in our lives, and these steps are difficult and can be  very anxiety provoking for people like me, even when approached humbly and prayerfully. It would be easier to say that our job or goal in this area is complete and therefore now we can move on to the next job, or goal or adventure. But life is not always that simple. Things change, or change is forced upon us, despite the incompleteness of our work or lives or relationships.

In those times we trust that God’s faithfulness does not depend on our achievements, or lack-of, no matter how Godly our aspirations are. So, at some point, missionaries return from their place of mission, pastors move on from their congregation, doctors move on from their community of service, teachers move on from their pupils, parents move on from their parenting responsibilities,  and at least for a time, it feels like we are drifting on open, uncharted waters.

But God is faithful. He never leaves us or forsakes us. And true greatness belongs only to Him. We trust that he is at work in our lives, leading us, rather than chasing us down.

And when we finally must give account, the best we can hope to say is, “We are unworthy servants; we have only done our duty.”

And for many like me, we may be painfully aware that we have not done our duty.

But God is faithful. He never leaves us or forsakes us. He is able to make us stand on that final day of reckoning.

And true greatness belongs only to Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Churches Shouldn’t Compete

Many of us are competitive by nature. If there is anything innately good regarding competitiveness, I’m not sure I have discovered it.
Does it push us towards better products, better outcomes, better results? The answer is clearly yes. But is it possible to produce excellence without competition? I think the answer is also yes.
In Australia, there was a man who amongst other things, produced a water tank, which originally was pulled by horses. I don’t think there was anything too spectacular about these tanks, but they are now a sought-after relic, and on them, this man of faith, John Furphy wrote what I believe was a personal motto. “Good, better, best, never let it rest, until your good is better, and your better best.”
If nothing else this motto describes someone who is motivated to produce to a high standard.

If we turn to the scriptures, I immediately think of a number of situations which could be described as “competitive”, though you might disagree.
Cain and Abel.
Jacob and Esau.
David and Saul.
There are others including nations.
Wars and battles within wars are a type of competition.
“Success” is an attractive word. Winning any competition is also attractive.
The strive to succeed is a well accepted attitude in western society.
But let’s consider the personal effects of competition.
Firstly, competition sets priorities. Once we are in a race, our priority is to win the race (I am generalizing), and therefore spending time or effort on other activities, unrelated to the race, would be avoided.
Then, once the race is over there are personal responses to the results.
For me, winning a race would potentially generate pride. Losing would potentially generate shame. Neither outcome would be considered godly. It is interesting that many people describe experiencing emotional "lows" at some point after major success.

We are instructed to "strive" in the New Testament.
We are told to be eager to do good works. 

1 Thessalonians 5:15 (NIV) Make sure that nobody pays back wrong for wrong, but always strive to do what is good for each other and for everyone else.

 
Paul spoke about beating his body so that he would not run the race in vain. But the race he is talking about is the Christian life of witness and service. (Which are actually the same things).

1 Corinthians 15:58 (NIV) Therefore, my dear brothers and sisters, stand firm. Let nothing move you. Always give yourselves fully to the work of the Lord, because you know that your labor in the Lord is not in vain.
Philippians 2:3-4 (NIV) Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves, 4 not looking to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others.
Hebrews 12:1-2 (NIV) And let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us, 2 fixing our eyes on Jesus, the pioneer and perfecter of faith.
1 Timothy 4:8-10 (NIV) For physical training is of some value, but godliness has value for all things, holding promise for both the present life and the life to come. 9 This is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance. 10 That is why we labor and strive, because we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all people, and especially of those who believe. 

But in terms of “success”, Jesus repeatedly expresses a strange principle regarding the kingdom of God; the first shall be last and the last first. 

I state all of this to strongly suggest that churches do not need to compete, not with each other, not with the world.
You might say that they don’t, but my observation today is that we do compete, whether overtly or subtly. It may simply be human nature.
But as Christians, as local church gatherings, we are able to decide not to be motivated by natural tendencies.
So churches do not need to have the best speakers, music, sound system, building, kids program, coffee, video presentations, seating, parking, projects, technology or any other thing that comes to mind.
We do have to have sound doctrine and love for all our brethren, with an ongoing desire to meet together, and worship our Lord, as well as joy in sharing the good news of forgiveness. We must never forget our first love, and be willing to accept his discipline and correction.
We can and do find ample motivation to do things well, very well, simply by following the directive given, more than once, that in everything we do, we do it as though we are serving Jesus himself, our Lord, which is actually what we are doing.
If we maintain this attitude, then there is no need for competition, and no room for boasting.

Our gatherings may appear ordinary, but so did our Galilean Lord, even immediately after the resurrection.

Perfect Peace in your Presence Today

 

O Lord you’ve heard my prayers of sorrow,

With all my fears about tomorrow,

This heavy burden I’ve been carrying, please take it all away.

Help me to rise above the sadness,

May all my tears turn into gladness,

Lord grant me peace, your perfect peace, in your presence today.

 

Your perfect peace melts my fears away,

Filling me with joy to walk the narrow way.

 

Help me to rise above the sadness,

May all my tears turn into gladness,

Lord grant me peace, your perfect peace, in your presence today.

 

https://youtu.be/ZrBdAobPFVY